State Public Records Law

California Public Records Act

GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 -6276.48

Read the full text

Exemptions to Disclosure

    • §6254 states that the following records do not have to be disclosed: Preliminary drafts, notes, or interagency or intra-agency memoranda that are not retained by the public agency in the ordinary course of business, if the public interest in withholding those records clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure
    • Geological and geophysical data, plant production data, and similar information relating to utility systems development, or market or crop reports, that are obtained in confidence from any person
    • Records of Native American graves, cemeteries, and sacred places and records of Native American places, features, and objects
    • The working papers of both public bodies at the state and local level
    • All air pollution emission data, including those emission data which constitute trade secrets, are public records. However, data used to calculate emission data are not emission data. Data which constitute trade secrets and which are used to calculate emission data are not public records. In addition, data used to calculate the costs of obtaining emissions offsets are not public records. At the time that an air pollution control district or air quality management district issues a permit to construct to an applicant who is required to obtain offsets pursuant to district rules and regulations,data obtained from the applicant consisting of the year the offset transaction occurred, the amount of offsets purchased, by pollutant, and the total cost, by pollutant, of the offsets purchased is a public record. If an application is denied, the data shall not be a public record.
    • Trade secrets are not public records. “Trade secrets” may include, but are not limited to, any formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information which is not patented, which is known only to certain individuals within a commercial concern who are using it to fabricate, produce, or compound an article of trade or a service having commercial value and which gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use it;
    • Computer software developed by a public entity is not a public record;
    • Disclosure of records that relate to archaeological site information and reports maintained by, or in the possession of, the Department of Parks and Recreation, the State Historical Resources Commission, the State Lands Commission, the Native American Heritage Commission, another state agency, or a local agency, including the records that the agency obtains through a consultation process between a California Native American tribe and a state or local agency, do not have to be disclosed;
    • Nothing in this chapter requires the disclosure of records that relate to volatile organic compounds or chemical substances information received or compiled by an air pollution control officer pursuant to Section 42303.2 of the Health and Safety Code.
    • California does not have a specific academic freedom exemption in the California Public Records Act. However at least one California Appeals Court, in Humane Soc.of the U.S. v. Superior Ct. of Yolo County., 214 Cal. App. 4th 1233; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 235, justified exempting documents from public disclosure under the CPRA’s provision that exempts from public disclosure any document where the public interest in nondisclosure outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The Court held that requiring disclosure of the records “would fundamentally impair the academic research process to the detriment of the public that benefits from the studies produced by that research,” and that there was minimal public interest in the disclosure because all of the important information, particularly regarding methodology and results, was already available. The California court added that it was not creating a categorical “academic researcher’s exemption,” but emphasized that the public interest balancing had to be undertaken in every case.

    Access Rights

    • Every person
    • Office hours
    • Must be given suggestions for overcoming bases for denial of access
    • Disclosure of exempt record = waiver of exemption
    • Pretty much any air pollution records and info, except raw emissions data used to calculate such records, which constitutes trade secrets
    • Purpose for access is irrelevant
    • Entitled to response w/in 10 days, unless unusual circumstances call for extension (reasons for extension must then be provided in writing to the requestor)
    • No provision for a charge to view/inspect records
    • Agency has 10 days to decide whether to comply with a request, if additional personnel need to be consulted the 10 day period may be maxed at 14 days

    Destruction of Public Records

    • § 60201 – Legislative body can dispose of records if it determines not at all useful to anyone, and maintains list of all disposed records
    • Can destroy public records pursuant to law

Whistleblower Score

Rank: 2/51

California has one of the most complete state whistleblower laws with broad coverage (20 out of 33 possible points),maximum usability (33 out of 33) and strong remedies (24 out of 33) plus the one bonus point awarded for employee notification of rights. 

Read the full assessment here»

California News

Regional Water Board Orders Clean-Up of Rubicon Trail

Iconic Off-Road Trail Has Lost Its Way

Deadly Domestic Sheep Disease Threatens Endangered Sierra Nevada Bighorn

Feds Threatened With Legal Action to Close Grazing Allotments, Remedy Endangered Species Act Violations

Constitutional Clash Over Defunct Land Exchange

Major Religious Establishment Case Rooted in Mojave Cross Deal

California Desert Wins New Protection via Feinstein Amendment

Lion’s Share of CDCA Included in Landscape Conservation System by Omnibus Bill

Army Corps Kayaker Case Settled

Biologist Who Demonstrated for the L.A. River Paddles off to Law School

California Desert’s Six Million Acre Question Mark

Bill Establishing Landscape Conservation System Fudges on CDCA Inclusion

Corps Biologist Faces 30-Day Suspension for Kayaking L.A. River

Off-Duty Challenge to Ruling River Was Not Navigable “Undermined Authority”

EPA Elbows Corps Aside to Protect Western Rivers

L.A. and Santa Cruz Rivers Will Benefit from Clean Water Act Safeguards

Park Service Cleared in Point Reyes Oyster Operation Complaint

Environmental Effects of Industrial Shellfish Operations Remain Murky

Off-Road Vehicle Route Designations Going Badly off Track

U.S. Senate Hearing Grasping for Solutions to Rising Toll of ORVs on Public Lands

Last Stand for the Mojave Cross?

Supreme Court Only Option to Stay Removal of Giant Cross after 9th Circuit Ruling

CONSERVATION GROUPS CHALLENGE SHRINKING HABITAT FOR RARE PLANT ON ALGODONES DUNES

Contact: Ileene Anderson, Center for Biological Diversity, (323) 654-5943 Karen Schambach, Public Employees for ...

PEIRSON’S MILK-VETCH FURTHER SQUASHED BY FEDS

Shrinking Habitat Is Fragmented for Rare Plant

BLM Drops Desert Road Plan for Furnace Creek

California Desert Wilderness Protected from Ravages of Off-Road Vehicles

Justice Department Undercuts Park System for Mojave Cross

Administration Argues Park Service Lacks Authority on Private Land within System

EPA SCIENTISTS CONDEMN AGENCY’S GREENHOUSE GAS WAIVER DENIAL

EPA Staff Decry Hypocrisy of Johnson’s Pledges of Scientific Rigor and Openness

INTERIOR ATTORNEY TO TESTIFY AGAINST GOVERNMENT IN COBELL CASE

Whistleblower to Detail Gross Mismanagement of Indian Accounts by Interior

AGENCY AUDIT VERIFIES WHISTLEBLOWER MISMANAGEMENT CHARGES

Interior Continues to Mangle Indian Trust Accounts, Losing Millions Monthly

JUDGE DENIES OFF-ROAD VEHICLE ACCESS TO SURPRISE CANYON

Unique Oasis in Death Valley National Park Saved

OFF-ROAD POLITICS BENDING CALIFORNIA PARK PROTECTIONS

Conservation Groups Warn State to Tread Lightly in State Parks
No results found.