Protecting America’s Parks & Public Lands for All
Approximately 600 million acres of land and water in the United States are managed for public use. These public lands include federal lands like national parks, forests, wildlife refuges, and monuments, as well as state and local areas owned by the public.
Many federal agencies manage these public places, including the National Park Service, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Forest Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. With the help of employees in these agencies, PEER is committed to safeguarding our public lands so that they provide habitat for wildlife, opportunities for people to enjoy nature, and the preservation of intact, undisturbed ecosystems.
PEER also supports increased staff levels in land management agencies. Rangers and land managers are facing declining budgets, lower staffing levels, and an increase in responsibilities as the use of our public lands grows dramatically.
Here’s how PEER is pushing back against efforts to undermine our public lands for the benefit of special interests.
U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Grazing & Rangeland Health
Livestock grazing allows heavily subsidized private operators to destroy our public lands. PEER is a leader in challenging government agencies to protect and restore wildlife and ecosystems from the effects of overgrazing.
Oil & Gas
Too often, regulatory agencies ignore the environmental and public health harm caused by oil and gas development on public lands. PEER works to minimize the impacts of the fossil fuel industry on public lands.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Wilderness Areas
National parks contain some of the most magnificent wild lands in our nation and, for that matter, the world. PEER advocates passionately for increased protections for existing wilderness areas and expanding existing wilderness designations.
Park Overflights
Excessive commercial intrusions in the skies above national parks are too common. PEER is continuing its successful work to limit commercial air tours over parks that disturb wildlife and ruin the visitor experience.
Cell Towers on Public Lands
Cell phone towers are spreading across national parks without proper planning and public input. PEER is challenging the National Park Service to involve the public and protect the wilderness experience in its decisions on building new telecommunications infrastructure on public lands.
Plastic-Free Parks
Plastics are inundating our national parks, harming wildlife and public health and wasting precious government resources on managing the waste. PEER is working to speed up the phaseout of single–use plastics in national parks and is calling for steep reductions in plastic usage at parks.
A SNAPSHOT OF PEER’S PAST EFFORTS
Here are some examples of how PEER has made a difference:
- Helped get genetically modified crops out of National Wildlife Refuges
- Halted off-road vehicles from destroying national forests, parks, and fragile desert lands
- Successfully forced reductions in disruptive air tours over many of America’s national parks
PEER’S PERSPECTIVE
Letter to Interior Secretary Burgum – National Park Service Probationary Employees
READ MORE NEWS ON PARKS & PUBLIC LANDS
NOAA’s Big Storm Problem in Hawaii
New Regional Office Inaccessible During Tsunami, Hurricane or Major Storm
Stonewall on Petroglyph Pact Leaves Monument in Limbo
Management Agreement Expires as Rock Art Community Gathers for Conference
No Sequester for Jet-Skiing in National Parks
Hefty Spending to Expand Activities Aggravated by Ranger Furloughs
Selling National Park Scenery Cheaply
$56 Million Mitigation Deal for Transmission Corridor across Delaware Water Gap
Federal Review of Missouri Parks’ Drinking Water Sought
Whistleblower Cites Contaminated Water in State Parks and Lax Enforcement
Languishing Wilderness Legacy of National Parks
Vast Wild and Roadless Tracts Remain Unprotected in Wilderness Logjam
Plans to Wire Entire National Park System
Concessionaires Would Control Visitor Cell and Internet Access and Content
BLM Says It Cannot Track Cattle on Its Lands
Blames Lack of “Seamless Data” for Excluding Livestock from Range Assessments