Fighting for Scientific Integrity and the
Protection of Scientists
Government scientists are often under political pressure to alter, dilute, or suppress their findings on issues of controversy. All too frequently, government leaders interfere with the work of scientists that threaten powerful interests. This is especially true for scientists working on environmental and public health issues, who must contend with:
-
- Alteration or disregard of environmental assessments;
- Interference in research and staffing decisions; and,
- Retaliation for conclusions that are inconvenient to a political viewpoint or that expose scientific integrity abuses.
For each story in the news about political interference in science, scores of other instances are taking place behind the scenes in government laboratories, grant review sessions, and field stations across the country.
PEER provides free, accessible, and completely confidential legal consultation and counsel to government scientists. We work to keep government science strong, independent, and transparent so that it can support effective decision-making.
Are you a government scientist in need of advice? Contact us. PEER offers many forms of assistance to scientists and is one of the only organizations in the country to assist government employees in filing scientific integrity complaints, complaints with Inspectors General, and in other forums.
LEARN MORE
Defending Academic Freedom
Listen to the story of Dr. David Carpenter, a long-tenured professor who PEER represented when his University placed restrictions on his work after it drew negative attention from Monsanto. Learn more»
Representing Government Scientists
PEER regularly represents government scientists like Jonathan Lundgren, PhD, a former USDA scientist whose agency prioritized “Big Ag” over his research. He shares how PEER helped him protect the integrity of his scientific work. Learn more»

Strengthening Scientific Integrity
Strong scientific integrity policies are crucial to protect the work of scientists within the federal government. PEER organized a sign on letter urging the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to strengthen its model policy, Learn more»
SUBSCRIBE TO PEERMAIL Get informative commentaries, urgent action alerts, and the latest updates on our work.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking subscribe, I consent to PEER storing my personal information per the privacy guarantee.
A SNAPSHOT OF PEER’S PAST EFFORTS
Here are some examples of how PEER has made a difference:
- Advised a major federal union on strengthening scientific integrity policies, resulting in the first union provision protecting scientific integrity in a collective bargaining agreement.
- Successfully represented a leading wolf expert in resolving an academic freedom complaint after his work came under attack from the livestock industry.
- Filed an Inspector General complaint that EPA had downplayed the cancer risks of a common soil fumigant and nematicide, which the IG later confirmed.
- Fought against gag rules in scientific integrity policies that limit government scientists’ ability to speak on policy issues.
PEER’S PERSPECTIVE
New Integrity Rules Differ on Allowable Scientist Speech
READ MORE NEWS ON SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
Corporate Takeover of New Jersey’s Environmental Science
Hand-Picked Science Advisors Meet in Secret to Produce Un-Reviewed Reports
Polar Bear Probe Lumbers Into Its Third Year
New IG Interviews This Week as Arctic Research Flounders in Uncertainty
Sen. Feinstein Wrong (Again) on Point Reyes Science
Her Latest Bogus Charges Reflect Pattern of Political Pressure for Oyster Outfit
Interior Loosens Gag on Employee Off-Duty Speech
New “Public Communications” Rules Leave Gray Areas Which May Chill Expression
Peer Review Supports Park Service Science on Drakes Estero
Independent Analysis Strengthens Case for Wilderness over Commercial Use
Virginia Supreme Court Halts Climate-Denier AG Witch Hunt
Right-Wing Allies Still Seeking Researcher’s Papers in Related Suit
High-Level Lowball in Gulf Deepwater Crisis
Scientific Integrity Complaint Details Official Underestimation of BP Spill Rate
Grazing Punted From Federal Study of Land Changes in West
Scientists Told to Not Consider Grazing Due to Fear of Lawsuits and Data Gaps