Forest Service Drones Stuck in Hangar for 7 Years May Take Off
Drone Deployment to Be Governed by Internal Group With No Public Involvement
Washington, DC — The U.S. Forest Service’s star-crossed drone program may have found new life, according to agency documents posted today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). After years of being grounded in a hapless law enforcement program, the drones are being transferred to the Forest Service’s fire-fighting wing to be guided by an internal group which will not meet publicly and lacks a mandate to consider privacy concerns or other external issues.
In 2007, the Forest Service law enforcement program bought two pilotless aircraft for photo reconnaissance. Despite spending $100,000 to purchase them, the two “Sky Seers” never saw a day of service as the law enforcement program lacked both trained pilots and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) clearance to operate, according to documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
In a late 2010 briefing, the Forest Service law enforcement leadership informed the Chief Forester that it was giving up on its ill-defined plans to use its drones to combat marijuana cultivation in California forests and instead would transfer them to the agency’s Fire and Aviation program.
“These documents make the Keystone Kops look like a crack operation compared to the Forest Service law enforcement leadership,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that the law enforcement program stated it was “not aware of any legal or privacy constraints that would preclude the use” of a drone and thus did no review of the issue. “It was especially galling to understaffed law enforcement field staff that their leadership was buying fancy hardware it had no conception of how to use.”
In September 2012, the Forest Service Fire and Aviation Management adopted a formal charter for “Unmanned Aircraft Systems” establishing a special advisory committee to develop a “strategic plan” for drone use, to create protocols and guidance for their operation and to perform “risk assessment” of any proposed operations. The 14-member group was given three years to accomplish 10 listed tasks to facilitate drone deployment.
This steering committee, however, is internal to the Forest Service and is not required to hold public meetings. Nor is privacy protection for forest visitors or others among its assigned tasks.
“The Forest Service’s use of unmanned aircraft for fire management would not suffer in the least by being aired with the public,” added Ruch. “The Forest Service would benefit from greater public buy-in before its drones take flight.”
The fire program has been tinkering with pilotless aircraft since 2005 when it spent $10,560 on a Cyber Bug drone to begin developing command and control capacity in fast-moving fires. The FAA, however, is still working on rules to open unrestricted airspace to commercial and institutional drone traffic.