State Public Records Law
Colorado Open Records Act
For provisions concerning the distribution of reports of agencies pursuant to the “Information Coordination Act”, see § 24-1-136; for provisions concerning access to records pursuant to federal law, see the “Freedom of Information Act”, 5 U.S.C. § 552. Colorado Revised Statutes (2017)»
Read the full text
Exemptions to Disclosure
Public records do not include:
- Work product. Work product means all intra-or inter-agency advisory or deliberative materials assembled for the benefit of elected officials, which materials express an opinion or are deliberative in nature and are communicated for the purpose of assisting such elected officials in reaching a decision within the scope of their authority. Such materials include, but are not limited to notes and memoranda that relate to or serve as background information for such decisions; preliminary drafts and discussion copies of documents that express a decision by an elected official.
- An e-mail message must be for use in the performance of public functions or involve the receipt of public funds. A message sent in furtherance of a personal relationship does not fall within the definition. The fact that a public employee or public official sent or received a message while compensated by public funds or using publicly owned computer equipment is insufficient to make the message a “public record”. Denver Publ’g Co. v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 121 P.3d 190 (Colo. 2005).
- §24-72-204 states that the custodian may deny a person’s right to inspect records such as “the specific details of bona fide research projects being conducted by a state institution, including, without limitation, research projects undertaken by staff or service agencies of the general assembly or the office of the governor in connection with pending or anticipated legislation;” and
- Trade secrets, privileged information, and confidential commercial data;
- Records protected under the common law governmental or “deliberative process” privilege, if the material is so candid or personal that public disclosure is likely to stifle honest and frank discussion within the government;
- Veterinary medical data, information, and records on individual animals that are owned by private individuals or business entities, but are in the custody of a veterinary medical practice or hospital, including the veterinary teaching hospital at Colorado state university, that provides veterinary medical care and treatment to animals;
- Email addresses provided by a person to a state institution for future communications may be exempt if disclosure is contrary to “public interest”
Access Rights
- All persons
- Custodian can make rules re: inspection that are reasonably necessary for the protection of such records and the prevention of unnecessary interference with the regular discharge of the duties of the custodian or the custodian’s office
- Reasonably prompt response to request for records (w/in 3 business days) – extenuating circumstances must be explained
- In no event can extenuating circumstances apply to a request that relates to a single, specifically identified document.
- Can request reasons for denial of access
- Fees – § 24-72-205, amended by 2014 Colo. Legis. Serv. Ch. 142 (H.B. 14-1193) (WEST); can’t exceed $0.25 per page for copy of the record, or fee not to exceed actual cost of providing copy in whatever format it is provided
- Possession by public entity doesn’t render record public
- If records are not immediately accessible/available the “reasonable” amount of time for their delivery is 3 business days or less
- Can’t exceed 7 business days
- No fee for email transmission
Destruction of Public Records
- 24-80-103 et seq states that record custodians must periodically consult with the department of personnel and the attorney general of the state to determine whether the records in question are of legal, administrative, or historical value. Those that do not can be destroyed, after a list of such documents is compiled, and the custodian, department of personnel and AG certify that this law has been complied with.
- Custodian must consult with the department of personnel and they will determine whether the records are of legal, administrative, or historical value. Records that do not fall within one of those classifications will be disposed of according to the officer.
- A list of all of the disposed records along with a statement certifying compliance signed by the officers must be filed and kept in the office that the records were taken from.
Whistleblower Score
Rank: 13/51
Colorado has a reasonably strong state whistleblower law with moderately broad coverage (18 out of 33 possible points) with a high degree of usability (27 out of 33) and strong remedies (21 out of 33).
What’s New In Colorado?
Colorado News
Letter to Secretary Kurtz – Maryland’s Whole Watershed Act – 9-27-2024 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Letter to Secretary Josh Kurtz concerning Maryland's Whole Watershed Act
TO: Secretary Josh Kurtz, ...
Colorado Air Pollution Data Stays in the Dark
EPA Caves in Colorado Suit to Block Pollution Transparency
Letter to Governor Polis – Oppose Lowry Ranch CAP – 7-29-2024 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Letter to Colorado Governor Jared Polis to oppose Lowry Ranch CAP (Comprehensive Area Plan) to the ...
COMMENTARY | It’s Not Easy Being a BLM Range Conservationist
Former Bureau of Land Management employee Kathy Voth shares her perspective on the agency's management of federal ...
BLM Veteran Decries Diminishing Range Protection
Inattention to Livestock Program Drives Deteriorating Land Conditions
EPA Rejects Air-Pollution Permits for Oil, Gas Wells in Colorado
Win for Clean Air Calls Into Question Effectiveness of Pollution Controls
Colorado’s Air Pollution Program Broken and Adrift
State’s Air Quality Worsens While Cosmetic Changes Ignore Core Problems
Comment – Colorado Dredge and Fill Proposal – 09-01-2023 (PDF)
Written comments in response to the list of questions posed to stakeholders regarding the creation of state dredge ...
Op-Ed | The BLM Is Ignoring Its Most Serious Land-Health Problem
This head-in-the-sand approach to destructive livestock grazing has to stop.
Rampant Grazing Trespassing Goes Unpunished
Whistleblower Faces Suspension for Saying BLM Lacks “Gumption”
More Oil and Gas Wells Illegally Permitted in Colorado
Conservation groups petition EPA to step in and protect air quality
Letter to USFWS – De-Listing of Hookless Cactus – 06-12-2023 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Public Comment on removal of the Colorado Hookless Cactus from the Federal List of Endangered and ...
Cell Tower Casts Shade on Bryce Canyon Centennial
Regional Office Steamrolled over Park Management and Staff Objections
Colorado’s Air Quality Doomed to Get Worse
Gutted Reform Bill and New Regs Offer Nothing to Stem Downward Spiral
Public Comment – Colorado Air Quality Permits – 05-04-2023 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Public comments on Colorado Minor Source NSR Modeling Guideline for Air Quality Permits, submitted ...
Gold Mine Expansion OK Shows Broken Air Permit Process
Colorado Refuses to Fix Major Underlying Flaws in Approving New Permit
CPDHE Emails with Number of Permits – 11-11-2022 (PDF)
Statement of Support – Colorado Legislation HB1036 – 02-03-2023 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Statement of support of Colorado legislation HB1036 - a bill designed to encourage the use of ...
Letter to EPA Region 8 – Next Steps on Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment – 11-11-2022 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Letter to EPA Region 8 Administrator KC Becker requesting meeting on Colorado Department of Public ...
Substantial PFAS Contamination Found in Pesticides in Colorado
Threat to Food Chain Justifies Colorado Ban of All Pesticides Containing PFAS