Fighting for Scientific Integrity and the
Protection of Scientists
Government scientists are often under political pressure to alter, dilute, or suppress their findings on issues of controversy. All too frequently, government leaders interfere with the work of scientists that threaten powerful interests. This is especially true for scientists working on environmental and public health issues, who must contend with:
- Alteration or disregard of environmental assessments;
- Interference in research and staffing decisions; and,
- Retaliation for conclusions that are inconvenient to a political viewpoint or that expose scientific integrity abuses.
For each story in the news about political interference in science, scores of other instances are taking place behind the scenes in government laboratories, grant review sessions, and field stations across the country.
PEER provides free, accessible, and completely confidential legal consultation and counsel to government scientists. We work to keep government science strong, independent, and transparent so that it can support effective decision-making.
Are you a government scientist in need of advice? Contact us. PEER offers many forms of assistance to scientists and is one of the only organizations in the country to assist government employees in filing scientific integrity complaints, complaints with Inspectors General, and in other forums.
LEARN MORE
Defending Academic Freedom
Listen to the story of Dr. David Carpenter, a long-tenured professor who PEER represented when his University placed restrictions on his work after it drew negative attention from Monsanto. Learn more»
Representing Government Scientists
PEER regularly represents government scientists like Jonathan Lundgren, PhD, a former USDA scientist whose agency prioritized “Big Ag” over his research. He shares how PEER helped him protect the integrity of his scientific work. Learn more»
Strengthening Scientific Integrity
Strong scientific integrity policies are crucial to protect the work of scientists within the federal government. PEER organized a sign on letter urging the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to strengthen its model policy, Learn more»
SUBSCRIBE TO PEERMAIL Get informative commentaries, urgent action alerts, and the latest updates on our work.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking subscribe, I consent to PEER storing my personal information per the privacy guarantee.
A SNAPSHOT OF PEER’S PAST EFFORTS
Here are some examples of how PEER has made a difference:
- Advised a major federal union on strengthening scientific integrity policies, resulting in the first union provision protecting scientific integrity in a collective bargaining agreement.
- Successfully represented a leading wolf expert in resolving an academic freedom complaint after his work came under attack from the livestock industry.
- Filed an Inspector General complaint that EPA had downplayed the cancer risks of a common soil fumigant and nematicide, which the IG later confirmed.
- Fought against gag rules in scientific integrity policies that limit government scientists’ ability to speak on policy issues.
PEER’S PERSPECTIVE
New Integrity Rules Differ on Allowable Scientist Speech
READ MORE NEWS ON SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
New Integrity Rules Differ on Allowable Scientist Speech
Agencies Range from Bans on Policy Discussion to “Open Discourse” Pledges
EPA’s Latest Scientific Integrity Plan – Big Hat, No Cattle
No Implementing Rules to Enforce or Administer Lofty Rhetorical Standards
CPSC Scientific Integrity Plan Has a Screw Loose
Consumer Product Safety Commission Seeks to Muzzle Its Researchers
NIH’s Science Integrity Plan Has Missing and Misplaced Pieces
Draft Policy Faulted as Incomplete, Inconsistent, and Essentially Ineffective
Dr. Peter Corkeron: Fighting to Save the North Atlantic Right Whales
Dr. Corkeron faced enormous pressure during his time at NOAA, to not document and generally suppress concerns over the population management of North Atlantic Right Whales.
COMMENTARY | White House Censorship in the Name of Scientific Integrity
There is good reason to fear that a new Biden administration policy will create a broad chilling effect on scientific work involving hot button topics.
Dr. David Carpenter: Academic Freedom in Public Health
Dr. David Carpenter had been forbidden from teaching and barred from campus after an investigation launched through corporate political pressure over his research.
First Biden Scientific Integrity Policy Falls Well Short
Timid Health & Human Services Proposal Will Not Prevent Trump Abuses
