Fighting for Scientific Integrity and the Protection of Scientists
Public agency scientists are under growing political pressure to alter, dilute, or suppress their findings on issues of controversy. All too frequently, government leaders repudiate or interfere with the work of scientists when evidence supports policies that threaten powerful interests. This is especially true for those scientists working on environmental and public health issues, who must contend with:
-
- The suppression of science related to climate change and energy uses;
- Altering or disregarding environmental impact assessments;
- Interference in research and staff decisions;
- Retaliation for conclusion that are inconvenient to a political viewpoint or that expose scientific integrity abuses.
For each story in the news, scores of other instances are taking place behind the scenes in government laboratories, in grant review sessions, and in field stations across the country. On issues ranging from climate change to children’s health to pollution permits to land management issues, public agency scientists are being censored, obstructed, and marginalized.
PEER provides free, accessible, and completely confidential legal consultation and counsel to government scientists. We work to keep government science strong, independent, and transparent so that it can support effective decision-making.
Academic Freedom In New York
Dr. David Carpenter, a long tenured professor and the founding Dean of the University at Albany’s School of Public Health, had been forbidden from teaching and barred from coming to campus by university administrators on the grounds that he was the subject of an ongoing investigation.
Dr. Carpenter’s longtime public interest work and testimony in numerous lawsuits aiming to impose restrictions on human exposure to harmful chemicals and to compensate the injured have drawn the ire of the chemical industry, specifically Monsanto. Watch the Video »
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
NEWS FROM PEER
Polar Bear Probe Careens in New Directions
Inspector General Claims Even More Drowned Bears Seen Than Previously Reported
Polar Bear Study Probe Falls Flat
Inspector General Concerns on Joint U.S.-Canadian Study Prove Groundless
Suspension of Arctic Scientist Suddenly Lifted
Agency Reversal Comes as It Falls Under Investigation for Scientific Misconduct
NASA Refuses to Adopt Scientific Integrity Policy
Defiance May Signal White House Signature Initiative Is Foundering
NOAA Scientific Integrity Plan Offers No Shield for Scientists
Lack of Whistleblower Protection Leaves Scientists Vulnerable to Official Reprisal
Polar Bear Paper Remains Focus of IG Probe of Arctic Scientist
IG Refuses to Identify Criminal Charge Rejected by Justice Department
EPA Posts Pathetically Weak Scientific Integrity Proposal
No Rules to Ban Political Manipulation or Secure Transparency or Right to Publish
Arctic Scientist Protests Witch Hunt on Polar Bear Paper
Key Studies Disrupted as Supervising Federal Scientist Suspended from Duties
EPA Refuses to Study Risks of Coal Ash Uses It Endorses
Scientists Told Agency Does Not Want Safety Concerns Raised about Coal Ash
Barrier Between Public Service and Nonprofits Falling
Ethics Rule Restricting Federal Employees from Nonprofit Boards Set for Repeal
Barrier Between Public Service and Nonprofits Falling
Ethics Rule Restricting Federal Employees from Nonprofit Boards Set for Repeal
NOAA Keeps Gag Rule on University Marine Scientists
Rejects Petition to Lift Ban against “Advocacy” by Sea Grant Recipients
Whistleblower Protections for Scientists Sidelined
Science Integrity Initiative Allows Agencies to Certify Current Practices as Sufficient
NOAA Scientific Integrity Plan Has Big Gaps to Fill In
Unresolved Tension Between Transparency and Management Content Control
Park Service Scientists Cleared Again in PT. Reyes Oyster Flap
Repeated Investigations Aimed at Keeping Commercial Oyster Operation in Estuary
Hawaii Tsunami Response Gets Mixed Federal Signals
NOAA Wants Tsunami Warning Center Relocated Where Navy Says to Evacuate
Press Office Screens Ocean Science for “Grammatical Errors”
Interior Says Fears Based on “Misinterpretation of Policy” But Issue No Correction
Interior First out of the Gate With Science Integrity Rules
Rules Ban Alteration of Technical Findings and Foster “Free Flow” of Scientific Data
Will EPA Sit out Scientific Integrity Rule-Making?
Memo Implies EPA Will Not Clarify Scientists’ Right to Publish or Speak with Media
Federal Agencies Flying Blind in Cape Wind Approvals
Internal E-Mails Admit Huge Data Gaps, Inability to Monitor and Pursue Mitigation