State Public Records Law
California Public Records Act
GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 -6276.48
Read the full text
Exemptions to Disclosure
-
- §6254 states that the following records do not have to be disclosed: Preliminary drafts, notes, or interagency or intra-agency memoranda that are not retained by the public agency in the ordinary course of business, if the public interest in withholding those records clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure
- Geological and geophysical data, plant production data, and similar information relating to utility systems development, or market or crop reports, that are obtained in confidence from any person
- Records of Native American graves, cemeteries, and sacred places and records of Native American places, features, and objects
- The working papers of both public bodies at the state and local level
- All air pollution emission data, including those emission data which constitute trade secrets, are public records. However, data used to calculate emission data are not emission data. Data which constitute trade secrets and which are used to calculate emission data are not public records. In addition, data used to calculate the costs of obtaining emissions offsets are not public records. At the time that an air pollution control district or air quality management district issues a permit to construct to an applicant who is required to obtain offsets pursuant to district rules and regulations,data obtained from the applicant consisting of the year the offset transaction occurred, the amount of offsets purchased, by pollutant, and the total cost, by pollutant, of the offsets purchased is a public record. If an application is denied, the data shall not be a public record.
- Trade secrets are not public records. “Trade secrets” may include, but are not limited to, any formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information which is not patented, which is known only to certain individuals within a commercial concern who are using it to fabricate, produce, or compound an article of trade or a service having commercial value and which gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use it;
- Computer software developed by a public entity is not a public record;
- Disclosure of records that relate to archaeological site information and reports maintained by, or in the possession of, the Department of Parks and Recreation, the State Historical Resources Commission, the State Lands Commission, the Native American Heritage Commission, another state agency, or a local agency, including the records that the agency obtains through a consultation process between a California Native American tribe and a state or local agency, do not have to be disclosed;
- Nothing in this chapter requires the disclosure of records that relate to volatile organic compounds or chemical substances information received or compiled by an air pollution control officer pursuant to Section 42303.2 of the Health and Safety Code.
- California does not have a specific academic freedom exemption in the California Public Records Act. However at least one California Appeals Court, in Humane Soc.of the U.S. v. Superior Ct. of Yolo County., 214 Cal. App. 4th 1233; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 235, justified exempting documents from public disclosure under the CPRA’s provision that exempts from public disclosure any document where the public interest in nondisclosure outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The Court held that requiring disclosure of the records “would fundamentally impair the academic research process to the detriment of the public that benefits from the studies produced by that research,” and that there was minimal public interest in the disclosure because all of the important information, particularly regarding methodology and results, was already available. The California court added that it was not creating a categorical “academic researcher’s exemption,” but emphasized that the public interest balancing had to be undertaken in every case.
Access Rights
- Every person
- Office hours
- Must be given suggestions for overcoming bases for denial of access
- Disclosure of exempt record = waiver of exemption
- Pretty much any air pollution records and info, except raw emissions data used to calculate such records, which constitutes trade secrets
- Purpose for access is irrelevant
- Entitled to response w/in 10 days, unless unusual circumstances call for extension (reasons for extension must then be provided in writing to the requestor)
- No provision for a charge to view/inspect records
- Agency has 10 days to decide whether to comply with a request, if additional personnel need to be consulted the 10 day period may be maxed at 14 days
Destruction of Public Records
- § 60201 – Legislative body can dispose of records if it determines not at all useful to anyone, and maintains list of all disposed records
- Can destroy public records pursuant to law
Whistleblower Score
Rank: 2/51
California has one of the most complete state whistleblower laws with broad coverage (20 out of 33 possible points),maximum usability (33 out of 33) and strong remedies (24 out of 33) plus the one bonus point awarded for employee notification of rights.
What’s New in California?
California News
LAUSD Faces Federal, State, & County Pesticide Violations
School District Hobbles Independent Pesticide Oversight Committee Function
Point Reyes Sweetheart Cattle Leases are Illegal
Dairy and Beef Ranches on Seashore Pay Far Below Fair Market Value
Santa Susana Slated to Remain Major Ecological Hazard
Post Cleanup Toxics Will Subject Wildlife to “Observable Adverse Effects”
COMMENTARY | Redeeming Santa Susana: Micro-Steps Up a Mountain
The communities around Santa Susana will continue to suffer while Boeing shirks responsibility and leaves a toxic legacy.
L.A. River Poisoned by Toxic PCBs
Santa Susana Likely Suspect but Water Board Withholding Documents
PFAS at Santa Susana Seep Through Regulatory Cracks
Toxic Forever Chemicals Not Monitored in Discharge or Included in Cleanup
Op-Ed | San Francisco’s Sewage Agency Also Needs Some Treatment
San Francisco taxpayers and ratepayers are footing the bill in the fight against tougher sewage controls on its ...
Major San Francisco Sewage Flooding Likely to Recur
Outfall Closure Makes City More Vulnerable in Atmospheric River Events
Nutrient Bomb Set to Detonate in San Francisco Bay
$3 Billion Plan Will Inject Even More Nutrients into Degraded Estuary
San Francisco PUC Awash in Water Pollution Violations
City Agency Facing Stiff Fines Amid Pending Federal & State Legal Sanctions
Comment on Artificial Turf Field Installation – Harvard-Westlake River Park, Los Angeles – 07-11-2023 (PDF)
DESCRIPTION: Harvard-Westlake River Park Project Final Environmental Impact Report - Comment in regards to the ...
Navy Refuses to Probe Hunters Point Toxic Disinformation
Navy IG Won’t Review False Statements on Sr-90 Levels in “Clean” Parcel
Change is Possible! National Parks Reclaim Their Skies
The first serious inroads have been made into curbing swarms of commercial air tours rumbling across some of ...
High Levels of Dangerous ‘Forever Chemicals’ Found in California’s Most-Used Insecticide
40% of Tested Agricultural Pesticide Products Contain PFAS
Hunters Point Festering Radiation Waste Woes
Navy Statements Mask Seriousness of Remaining Parcel G Contamination
San Francisco Parks Overflight Limits Grossly Inadequate
Suit Charges Air Tour Plan for Four Bay Area Parks Developed Illegally
Newsom Lets Boeing Keep Groundwater Forever Polluted
New Deal Sets No Timetable for Cleaning Highly Toxic Santa Susana Aquifer
Los Angeles’ Artificial Turf Plan Misguided
PFAS Found in Turf Dangerous for Children
Boeing’s Weak Santa Susana Cleanup Triggers Lawsuit
Sweetheart Deal Negotiated Behind Closed Doors Violates CEQA Mandates
EPA Says Hunters Point Will Never Be Fully Cleaned
EPA Plans to Ignore Prop P Mandate and Its Own Superfund Standards